必须是合法有效的IP地址, 可以是IPv4或者是IPv6, 例如127.0.0.1或者2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
基本信息:

城市(city): unknown

省份(region): unknown

国家(country): None

运营商(isp): unknown

主机名(hostname): unknown

机构(organization): unknown

使用类型(Usage Type): unknown

用户上报:
暂无关于此IP的讨论, 沙发请点上方按钮
相同子网IP讨论:
暂无关于此IP所属子网相关IP的讨论.
WHOIS信息:
b
DIG信息:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 104.20.121.49
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 9550
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;104.20.121.49.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			462	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022031500 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 74 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Wed Mar 16 01:37:49 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 106
HOST信息:
Host 49.121.20.104.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
NSLOOKUP信息:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

** server can't find 49.121.20.104.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
相关IP信息:
最新评论:
IP 类型 评论内容 时间
101.204.111.22 attackbotsspam
Brute force attempt
2020-01-11 05:01:38
69.229.6.45 attackspambots
2020-01-10T05:51:30.083367-07:00 suse-nuc sshd[19958]: Invalid user shares from 69.229.6.45 port 32866
...
2020-01-11 04:39:16
112.85.42.176 attackbotsspam
2020-01-10T21:50:02.0244771240 sshd\[20370\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=112.85.42.176  user=root
2020-01-10T21:50:04.0735201240 sshd\[20370\]: Failed password for root from 112.85.42.176 port 17202 ssh2
2020-01-10T21:50:07.2130521240 sshd\[20370\]: Failed password for root from 112.85.42.176 port 17202 ssh2
...
2020-01-11 04:53:01
106.12.36.21 attackspam
Jan 10 12:42:47 ip-172-31-62-245 sshd\[6242\]: Invalid user eno from 106.12.36.21\
Jan 10 12:42:49 ip-172-31-62-245 sshd\[6242\]: Failed password for invalid user eno from 106.12.36.21 port 37746 ssh2\
Jan 10 12:47:20 ip-172-31-62-245 sshd\[6309\]: Failed password for root from 106.12.36.21 port 35810 ssh2\
Jan 10 12:51:21 ip-172-31-62-245 sshd\[6391\]: Invalid user jeo from 106.12.36.21\
Jan 10 12:51:23 ip-172-31-62-245 sshd\[6391\]: Failed password for invalid user jeo from 106.12.36.21 port 33898 ssh2\
2020-01-11 04:45:53
138.197.129.38 attackbots
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: Invalid user caim from 138.197.129.38 port 36866
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=138.197.129.38 
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: Invalid user caim from 138.197.129.38 port 36866
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=138.197.129.38 
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: Invalid user caim from 138.197.129.38 port 36866
Jan  9 08:01:24 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=138.197.129.38 
Jan  9 08:01:26 tuxlinux sshd[39779]: Failed password for invalid user caim from 138.197.129.38 port 36866 ssh2
...
2020-01-11 04:32:22
185.112.82.239 attack
0,28-03/04 [bc01/m09] PostRequest-Spammer scoring: essen
2020-01-11 04:40:58
107.175.89.162 attackspam
Scanning random ports - tries to find possible vulnerable services
2020-01-11 04:33:59
189.182.144.54 attack
20/1/10@07:51:38: FAIL: Alarm-Network address from=189.182.144.54
20/1/10@07:51:38: FAIL: Alarm-Network address from=189.182.144.54
...
2020-01-11 04:35:35
103.82.80.35 attack
Jan 10 13:50:48 grey postfix/smtpd\[13995\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown\[103.82.80.35\]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable\; Client host \[103.82.80.35\] blocked using cbl.abuseat.org\; Blocked - see http://www.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi\?ip=103.82.80.35\; from=\ to=\ proto=ESMTP helo=\<\[103.82.80.35\]\>
...
2020-01-11 05:04:16
51.77.119.185 attackspam
WordPress wp-login brute force :: 51.77.119.185 0.176 - [10/Jan/2020:16:32:19  0000] [censored_1] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 1806 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0" "HTTP/1.1"
2020-01-11 04:33:03
80.82.77.212 attack
80.82.77.212 was recorded 14 times by 8 hosts attempting to connect to the following ports: 1900,3283. Incident counter (4h, 24h, all-time): 14, 77, 2673
2020-01-11 04:38:46
36.69.130.176 attackspam
1578660657 - 01/10/2020 13:50:57 Host: 36.69.130.176/36.69.130.176 Port: 445 TCP Blocked
2020-01-11 05:00:41
114.124.161.122 attack
Jan 10 13:51:33 grey postfix/smtpd\[13995\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown\[114.124.161.122\]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable\; Client host \[114.124.161.122\] blocked using cbl.abuseat.org\; Blocked - see http://www.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi\?ip=114.124.161.122\; from=\ to=\ proto=ESMTP helo=\<\[172.16.38.232\]\>
...
2020-01-11 04:36:51
212.64.57.124 attackspam
Automatic report - SSH Brute-Force Attack
2020-01-11 04:33:30
176.113.115.50 attackspam
01/10/2020-15:55:23.111197 176.113.115.50 Protocol: 6 ET SCAN NMAP -sS window 1024
2020-01-11 05:02:35

最近上报的IP列表

231.117.240.127 104.20.126.80 104.20.127.121 104.20.127.80
104.20.128.121 104.20.128.67 104.20.129.104 104.20.129.67
48.38.39.139 63.24.29.47 104.20.130.104 124.52.27.201
29.178.220.225 57.152.221.23 104.20.65.35 104.20.84.253
104.20.92.172 104.20.93.172 104.20.96.123 104.20.96.126