| 189.154.176.137 |
attackspambots |
Oct 2 20:03:35 our-server-hostname sshd[21549]: reveeclipse mapping checking getaddrinfo for dsl-189-154-176-137-dyn.prod-infinhostnameum.com.mx [189.154.176.137] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Oct 2 20:03:35 our-server-hostname sshd[21549]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.154.176.137 user=r.r
Oct 2 20:03:37 our-server-hostname sshd[21549]: Failed password for r.r from 189.154.176.137 port 34436 ssh2
Oct 2 20:13:45 our-server-hostname sshd[22569]: reveeclipse mapping checking getaddrinfo for dsl-189-154-176-137-dyn.prod-infinhostnameum.com.mx [189.154.176.137] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Oct 2 20:13:45 our-server-hostname sshd[22569]: Invalid user ubuntu from 189.154.176.137
Oct 2 20:13:45 our-server-hostname sshd[22569]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.154.176.137
Oct 2 20:13:47 our-server-hostname sshd[22569]: Failed password fo........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 12:26:06 |
| 139.59.161.78 |
attack |
Oct 3 05:09:44 ip106 sshd[16591]: Failed password for root from 139.59.161.78 port 57577 ssh2
Oct 3 05:13:04 ip106 sshd[16692]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.59.161.78
... |
2020-10-03 12:05:52 |
| 114.129.168.188 |
attackspambots |
[MK-VM5] Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 07:18:21 |
| 51.195.47.153 |
attackspam |
ssh brute force |
2020-10-03 12:20:17 |
| 2.57.122.221 |
attackspam |
Oct 2 16:44:35 propaganda sshd[27077]: Disconnected from 2.57.122.221 port 48820 [preauth] |
2020-10-03 12:18:44 |
| 89.233.112.6 |
attackbots |
port scan and connect, tcp 23 (telnet) |
2020-10-03 12:13:36 |
| 158.140.112.58 |
attackspam |
Icarus honeypot on github |
2020-10-03 12:09:12 |
| 34.120.202.146 |
attackbots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 12:06:19 |
| 190.167.244.87 |
attack |
Lines containing failures of 190.167.244.87
Oct 2 22:27:15 shared04 sshd[2191]: Did not receive identification string from 190.167.244.87 port 3192
Oct 2 22:27:17 shared04 sshd[2195]: Invalid user user1 from 190.167.244.87 port 3994
Oct 2 22:27:17 shared04 sshd[2195]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=190.167.244.87
Oct 2 22:27:19 shared04 sshd[2195]: Failed password for invalid user user1 from 190.167.244.87 port 3994 ssh2
Oct 2 22:27:20 shared04 sshd[2195]: Connection closed by invalid user user1 190.167.244.87 port 3994 [preauth]
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=190.167.244.87 |
2020-10-03 12:18:59 |
| 103.240.237.182 |
attackbotsspam |
Lines containing failures of 103.240.237.182 (max 1000)
Oct 2 22:23:54 server sshd[5607]: Connection from 103.240.237.182 port 13041 on 62.116.165.82 port 22
Oct 2 22:23:54 server sshd[5607]: Did not receive identification string from 103.240.237.182 port 13041
Oct 2 22:23:57 server sshd[5611]: Connection from 103.240.237.182 port 10054 on 62.116.165.82 port 22
Oct 2 22:23:58 server sshd[5611]: Address 103.240.237.182 maps to dhcp.tripleplay.in, but this does not map back to the address - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Oct 2 22:23:58 server sshd[5611]: Invalid user admin1 from 103.240.237.182 port 10054
Oct 2 22:23:58 server sshd[5611]: Connection closed by 103.240.237.182 port 10054 [preauth]
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=103.240.237.182 |
2020-10-03 12:02:00 |
| 222.186.42.213 |
attack |
$f2bV_matches |
2020-10-03 12:11:20 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 12:17:46 |
| 167.172.36.232 |
attack |
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: Invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:01 email sshd\[633\]: Failed password for invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232 port 46238 ssh2
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: Invalid user walter from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
... |
2020-10-03 12:10:22 |
| 47.113.87.53 |
attackspambots |
Unauthorized admin access - /admin/login.php |
2020-10-03 07:16:29 |
| 183.166.170.133 |
attack |
Oct 2 22:30:45 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[1755\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:34:11 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[6490\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:37:37 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:41:03 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:41:14 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
... |
2020-10-03 07:11:24 |