必须是合法有效的IP地址, 可以是IPv4或者是IPv6, 例如127.0.0.1或者2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
基本信息:

城市(city): unknown

省份(region): unknown

国家(country): None

运营商(isp): unknown

主机名(hostname): unknown

机构(organization): unknown

使用类型(Usage Type): unknown

用户上报:
暂无关于此IP的讨论, 沙发请点上方按钮
相同子网IP讨论:
暂无关于此IP所属子网相关IP的讨论.
WHOIS信息:
b
DIG信息:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 104.21.70.26
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 62697
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;104.21.70.26.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			203	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022022000 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 63 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sun Feb 20 20:46:35 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 105
HOST信息:
Host 26.70.21.104.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
NSLOOKUP信息:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

** server can't find 26.70.21.104.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
相关IP信息:
最新评论:
IP 类型 评论内容 时间
222.174.213.180 attackspam
(sshd) Failed SSH login from 222.174.213.180 (CN/China/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_SSHD; Logs: Oct  3 07:28:06 server sshd[32016]: Invalid user bala from 222.174.213.180 port 53936
Oct  3 07:28:07 server sshd[32016]: Failed password for invalid user bala from 222.174.213.180 port 53936 ssh2
Oct  3 07:31:36 server sshd[392]: Invalid user steamcmd from 222.174.213.180 port 38032
Oct  3 07:31:38 server sshd[392]: Failed password for invalid user steamcmd from 222.174.213.180 port 38032 ssh2
Oct  3 08:00:15 server sshd[7331]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=222.174.213.180  user=root
2020-10-03 20:10:00
117.50.7.14 attack
SSH login attempts.
2020-10-03 20:07:49
162.243.128.166 attackspam
Port Scan
...
2020-10-03 20:10:45
206.189.210.235 attackbotsspam
Invalid user ivanov from 206.189.210.235 port 3100
2020-10-03 20:34:06
114.4.227.194 attack
2020-10-03T13:09:20.614817mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726
2020-10-03T13:09:20.617653mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=114.4.227.194
2020-10-03T13:09:20.614817mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726
2020-10-03T13:09:22.371814mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Failed password for invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726 ssh2
2020-10-03T13:13:42.416069mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[16585]: Invalid user tor from 114.4.227.194 port 36896
...
2020-10-03 20:03:35
156.96.56.54 attackbots
Port probe, connect, and relay attempt on SMTP:25.
Spammer. IP blocked.
2020-10-03 20:23:37
180.76.118.175 attack
SSH login attempts.
2020-10-03 20:26:53
119.93.42.153 attackspambots
Unauthorised access (Oct  2) SRC=119.93.42.153 LEN=52 PREC=0x20 TTL=119 ID=11395 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN
2020-10-03 19:54:26
42.200.148.195 attack
 TCP (SYN) 42.200.148.195:10932 -> port 23, len 44
2020-10-03 19:58:58
208.109.13.144 attackbots
Invalid user yt from 208.109.13.144 port 39024
2020-10-03 20:08:47
207.244.252.113 attackspambots
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way?  New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October -  just send a phone number and we'll call.

$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)

1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? 
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. 

Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 
2) You're legally able to demand this new option. 

Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?

We repre
2020-10-03 20:02:21
222.186.30.76 attack
2020-10-03T11:42:54.221250abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=222.186.30.76  user=root
2020-10-03T11:42:56.347904abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: Failed password for root from 222.186.30.76 port 32761 ssh2
2020-10-03T11:42:58.669126abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: Failed password for root from 222.186.30.76 port 32761 ssh2
2020-10-03T11:42:54.221250abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=222.186.30.76  user=root
2020-10-03T11:42:56.347904abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: Failed password for root from 222.186.30.76 port 32761 ssh2
2020-10-03T11:42:58.669126abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: Failed password for root from 222.186.30.76 port 32761 ssh2
2020-10-03T11:42:54.221250abusebot-6.cloudsearch.cf sshd[5047]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhos
...
2020-10-03 19:55:39
129.28.169.185 attackspambots
Invalid user kang from 129.28.169.185 port 56482
2020-10-03 20:06:59
122.51.31.40 attackspam
Invalid user it from 122.51.31.40 port 37358
2020-10-03 20:19:15
103.55.91.131 attack
Unauthorised connection attempt detected at AUO NODE 4. System is sshd. Protected by AUO Stack Web Application Firewall (WAF)
2020-10-03 20:31:45

最近上报的IP列表

104.21.70.252 104.21.70.37 104.21.70.56 104.21.70.58
13.126.61.78 104.21.70.72 104.21.70.85 104.21.70.92
104.21.71.103 104.21.71.108 104.21.71.109 104.21.71.158
13.210.243.53 13.210.51.21 13.210.84.120 13.210.83.67
13.210.43.63 13.211.10.119 13.211.113.16 13.210.228.132