| 42.234.238.34 |
attackspambots |
404 NOT FOUND |
2020-10-03 22:04:06 |
| 129.226.112.181 |
attackbotsspam |
[N10.H2.VM2] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 22:04:30 |
| 119.45.46.159 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 00:00:36 vpn01 sshd[11557]: Failed password for root from 119.45.46.159 port 48192 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 20:55:04 |
| 46.101.40.21 |
attackspam |
Oct 3 18:42:55 itv-usvr-02 sshd[30651]: Invalid user oracle from 46.101.40.21 port 55144
Oct 3 18:42:55 itv-usvr-02 sshd[30651]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.40.21
Oct 3 18:42:55 itv-usvr-02 sshd[30651]: Invalid user oracle from 46.101.40.21 port 55144
Oct 3 18:42:57 itv-usvr-02 sshd[30651]: Failed password for invalid user oracle from 46.101.40.21 port 55144 ssh2
Oct 3 18:50:23 itv-usvr-02 sshd[30978]: Invalid user user from 46.101.40.21 port 48124 |
2020-10-03 21:57:09 |
| 185.176.220.179 |
attackspambots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:57:58 |
| 46.101.8.39 |
attackbots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on comet |
2020-10-03 20:58:32 |
| 51.195.47.153 |
attackbotsspam |
Time: Sat Oct 3 14:50:49 2020 +0200
IP: 51.195.47.153 (FR/France/-0afdd373..ovh.net)
Failures: 5 (sshd)
Interval: 3600 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block [LF_SSHD]
Log entries:
Oct 3 14:33:32 mail sshd[8711]: Invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858
Oct 3 14:33:34 mail sshd[8711]: Failed password for invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858 ssh2
Oct 3 14:47:14 mail sshd[9416]: Invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452
Oct 3 14:47:17 mail sshd[9416]: Failed password for invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452 ssh2
Oct 3 14:50:44 mail sshd[9569]: Invalid user robert from 51.195.47.153 port 44684 |
2020-10-03 20:54:46 |
| 175.137.104.57 |
attack |
Lines containing failures of 175.137.104.57 (max 1000)
Oct 2 22:27:37 srv sshd[98150]: Connection closed by 175.137.104.57 port 61298
Oct 2 22:27:40 srv sshd[98151]: Invalid user 666666 from 175.137.104.57 port 61479
Oct 2 22:27:40 srv sshd[98151]: Connection closed by invalid user 666666 175.137.104.57 port 61479 [preauth]
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=175.137.104.57 |
2020-10-03 20:55:42 |
| 183.111.148.118 |
attackbotsspam |
Port scan: Attack repeated for 24 hours |
2020-10-03 22:00:22 |
| 159.65.154.48 |
attack |
[N3.H3.VM3] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 21:55:53 |
| 112.238.151.20 |
attackspambots |
REQUESTED PAGE: /GponForm/diag_Form?images/ |
2020-10-03 21:11:47 |
| 45.125.222.120 |
attack |
Invalid user ftptest from 45.125.222.120 port 41354 |
2020-10-03 22:06:40 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 188.166.178.42 |
attackspambots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on air |
2020-10-03 21:15:22 |
| 80.20.14.250 |
attackspambots |
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:26 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Failed password for invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250 port 37834 ssh2
Oct 3 15:02:57 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250 user=root
Oct 3 15:02:59 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: Failed password for root from 80.20.14.250 port 56000 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 21:18:02 |