| 45.148.121.92 |
attackspam |
UDP port : 5060 |
2020-10-03 20:46:55 |
| 103.246.240.30 |
attackspambots |
103.246.240.30 (IN/India/-), 6 distributed sshd attacks on account [root] in the last 3600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_DISTATTACK; Logs: Oct 3 07:32:17 server2 sshd[31775]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30 user=root
Oct 3 07:32:19 server2 sshd[31775]: Failed password for root from 103.246.240.30 port 50354 ssh2
Oct 3 07:25:20 server2 sshd[25560]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=156.54.174.197 user=root
Oct 3 07:25:22 server2 sshd[25560]: Failed password for root from 156.54.174.197 port 52856 ssh2
Oct 3 07:23:44 server2 sshd[23663]: Failed password for root from 160.153.252.9 port 51300 ssh2
Oct 3 07:34:28 server2 sshd[1237]: Failed password for root from 92.222.77.150 port 50012 ssh2
IP Addresses Blocked: |
2020-10-03 20:46:33 |
| 160.124.103.55 |
attack |
Unauthorised connection attempt detected at AUO MAIN. System is sshd. Protected by AUO Stack Web Application Firewall (WAF) |
2020-10-03 20:38:18 |
| 51.254.32.102 |
attack |
SSH brutforce |
2020-10-03 21:08:05 |
| 139.59.161.78 |
attackbots |
Invalid user cute from 139.59.161.78 port 49620 |
2020-10-03 20:39:55 |
| 128.199.160.35 |
attackspam |
SSH brutforce |
2020-10-03 20:56:01 |
| 108.62.123.167 |
attack |
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:53\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"6003" \' failed for '108.62.123.167:5631' - Wrong password
\[Oct 3 22:23:54\] NOTICE\[31025\] chan_sip.c: Registrati
... |
2020-10-03 20:28:25 |
| 208.109.9.14 |
attackspam |
$f2bV_matches |
2020-10-03 20:35:41 |
| 35.204.93.160 |
attack |
RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus
- UBE 188.240.221.164 (EHLO digitaldreamss.org) Virtono Networks Srl - BLACKLISTED
- Spam link digitaldreamss.org = 188.240.221.161 Virtono Networks Srl – BLACKLISTED
- Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – repetitive phishing redirect:
a) aptrk15.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) trck.fun = 104.18.35.68, 104.18.34.68, 172.67.208.63 Cloudflare
c) muw.agileconnection.company = 107.179.2.229 Global Frag Networks (common with multiple spam series)
d) effective URL: www.google.com
Images - 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/j2cp9tu3.png = link to health fraud video
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/ugqwjele.png = unsubscribe; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:02:02 |
| 154.209.253.241 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 14:49:55 serwer sshd\[25452\]: Invalid user ravi from 154.209.253.241 port 40898
Oct 3 14:49:55 serwer sshd\[25452\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=154.209.253.241
Oct 3 14:49:57 serwer sshd\[25452\]: Failed password for invalid user ravi from 154.209.253.241 port 40898 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 21:05:22 |
| 51.195.47.153 |
attackbotsspam |
Time: Sat Oct 3 14:50:49 2020 +0200
IP: 51.195.47.153 (FR/France/-0afdd373..ovh.net)
Failures: 5 (sshd)
Interval: 3600 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block [LF_SSHD]
Log entries:
Oct 3 14:33:32 mail sshd[8711]: Invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858
Oct 3 14:33:34 mail sshd[8711]: Failed password for invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858 ssh2
Oct 3 14:47:14 mail sshd[9416]: Invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452
Oct 3 14:47:17 mail sshd[9416]: Failed password for invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452 ssh2
Oct 3 14:50:44 mail sshd[9569]: Invalid user robert from 51.195.47.153 port 44684 |
2020-10-03 20:54:46 |
| 103.90.228.16 |
attackspam |
20 attempts against mh_ha-misbehave-ban on oak |
2020-10-03 21:02:51 |
| 120.9.254.171 |
attackspambots |
Port Scan detected!
... |
2020-10-03 20:31:24 |
| 170.0.160.165 |
attackspam |
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 20:51:29 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |