| 207.244.252.113 |
attackspam |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-04 04:00:38 |
| 37.49.226.169 |
attack |
TCP ports : 465 / 587 |
2020-10-04 04:01:51 |
| 212.70.149.36 |
attack |
Oct 3 21:54:37 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22075\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:54:55 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22183\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:55:13 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22075\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:55:34 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22183\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:56:02 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22075\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:56:21 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[25379\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:56:44 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[22183\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 21:57:10 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[25379\]: warning: unknown\[ |
2020-10-04 04:02:38 |
| 111.231.193.72 |
attackbots |
(sshd) Failed SSH login from 111.231.193.72 (CN/China/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs |
2020-10-04 04:15:09 |
| 185.108.106.251 |
attackbots |
[2020-10-03 15:47:06] NOTICE[1182] chan_sip.c: Registration from '' failed for '185.108.106.251:61270' - Wrong password
[2020-10-03 15:47:06] SECURITY[1204] res_security_log.c: SecurityEvent="InvalidPassword",EventTV="2020-10-03T15:47:06.135-0400",Severity="Error",Service="SIP",EventVersion="2",AccountID="1463",SessionID="0x7f22f8572958",LocalAddress="IPV4/UDP/192.168.244.6/5060",RemoteAddress="IPV4/UDP/185.108.106.251/61270",Challenge="1ea55ed6",ReceivedChallenge="1ea55ed6",ReceivedHash="87faa1082251ccfa63ed406f4b693f30"
[2020-10-03 15:47:47] NOTICE[1182] chan_sip.c: Registration from '' failed for '185.108.106.251:52549' - Wrong password
[2020-10-03 15:47:47] SECURITY[1204] res_security_log.c: SecurityEvent="InvalidPassword",EventTV="2020-10-03T15:47:47.765-0400",Severity="Error",Service="SIP",EventVersion="2",AccountID="3646",SessionID="0x7f22f83b6678",LocalAddress="IPV4/UDP/192.168.244.6/5060",RemoteAddress="IPV4/UDP/185.108
... |
2020-10-04 03:49:59 |
| 89.87.18.188 |
attack |
Oct 2 22:33:20 vps647732 sshd[1867]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=89.87.18.188
Oct 2 22:33:22 vps647732 sshd[1867]: Failed password for invalid user tit0nich from 89.87.18.188 port 50431 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:02:57 |
| 68.116.41.6 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 12:16:08 vps46666688 sshd[24531]: Failed password for root from 68.116.41.6 port 32934 ssh2
Oct 3 12:25:26 vps46666688 sshd[24649]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=68.116.41.6
... |
2020-10-04 03:54:59 |
| 114.67.77.159 |
attack |
Oct 3 19:59:17 mavik sshd[10789]: Failed password for invalid user ju from 114.67.77.159 port 58094 ssh2
Oct 3 20:02:04 mavik sshd[10896]: Invalid user igor from 114.67.77.159
Oct 3 20:02:04 mavik sshd[10896]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=114.67.77.159
Oct 3 20:02:07 mavik sshd[10896]: Failed password for invalid user igor from 114.67.77.159 port 42814 ssh2
Oct 3 20:04:58 mavik sshd[10964]: Invalid user admin from 114.67.77.159
... |
2020-10-04 04:12:34 |
| 36.133.87.7 |
attackbots |
2020-10-03 15:10:30.057483-0500 localhost sshd[85879]: Failed password for root from 36.133.87.7 port 52422 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:18:48 |
| 213.190.48.144 |
attackbotsspam |
1601670803 - 10/02/2020 22:33:23 Host: 213.190.48.144/213.190.48.144 Port: 445 TCP Blocked
... |
2020-10-04 04:02:09 |
| 115.223.34.141 |
attackspam |
2020-10-03T18:48:50.758270shield sshd\[5677\]: Invalid user wesley from 115.223.34.141 port 58157
2020-10-03T18:48:50.768602shield sshd\[5677\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=115.223.34.141
2020-10-03T18:48:52.621389shield sshd\[5677\]: Failed password for invalid user wesley from 115.223.34.141 port 58157 ssh2
2020-10-03T18:53:14.845142shield sshd\[5978\]: Invalid user gaurav from 115.223.34.141 port 21152
2020-10-03T18:53:14.856232shield sshd\[5978\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=115.223.34.141 |
2020-10-04 04:20:18 |
| 51.255.28.53 |
attackspambots |
Invalid user rust from 51.255.28.53 port 55490 |
2020-10-04 04:11:13 |
| 138.68.148.177 |
attack |
DATE:2020-10-03 20:05:08, IP:138.68.148.177, PORT:ssh SSH brute force auth (docker-dc) |
2020-10-04 04:04:27 |
| 111.40.217.92 |
attackspam |
Invalid user ted from 111.40.217.92 port 59255 |
2020-10-04 04:15:25 |
| 157.230.89.133 |
attackspambots |
Scanned 1 times in the last 24 hours on port 22 |
2020-10-04 03:57:48 |