| 36.7.80.168 |
attackspam |
SCAN: Host Sweep CloudCIX Reconnaissance Scan Detected, PTR: PTR record not found |
2020-10-03 22:03:26 |
| 61.133.232.253 |
attack |
2020-10-03T06:19:44.240665morrigan.ad5gb.com sshd[536936]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.133.232.253 user=git
2020-10-03T06:19:46.211805morrigan.ad5gb.com sshd[536936]: Failed password for git from 61.133.232.253 port 37394 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 20:47:20 |
| 49.233.3.177 |
attack |
Oct 3 10:05:39 localhost sshd\[18224\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=49.233.3.177 user=root
Oct 3 10:05:41 localhost sshd\[18224\]: Failed password for root from 49.233.3.177 port 40984 ssh2
Oct 3 10:24:55 localhost sshd\[18370\]: Invalid user camille from 49.233.3.177 port 60894
... |
2020-10-03 22:02:57 |
| 51.254.32.102 |
attack |
SSH brutforce |
2020-10-03 21:08:05 |
| 51.38.85.146 |
attackbotsspam |
[portscan] Port scan |
2020-10-03 21:08:40 |
| 103.90.228.16 |
attackspam |
20 attempts against mh_ha-misbehave-ban on oak |
2020-10-03 21:02:51 |
| 5.200.241.104 |
attackbotsspam |
1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 5.200.241.104/5.200.241.104 Port: 445 TCP Blocked |
2020-10-03 20:57:30 |
| 185.176.220.179 |
attackspambots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:57:58 |
| 146.185.215.204 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: warning: hostname bilaterale1.perkjcep.example.com does not resolve to address 146.185.215.204: Name or service not known
Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: connect from unknown[146.185.215.204]
Oct x@x
Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: disconnect from unknown[146.185.215.204]
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=146.185.215.204 |
2020-10-03 21:01:17 |
| 170.0.160.165 |
attackspam |
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 20:51:29 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 119.45.46.159 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 00:00:36 vpn01 sshd[11557]: Failed password for root from 119.45.46.159 port 48192 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 20:55:04 |
| 183.111.148.118 |
attackbotsspam |
Port scan: Attack repeated for 24 hours |
2020-10-03 22:00:22 |
| 34.96.218.228 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T16:52:50.212501paragon sshd[612934]: Invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796
2020-10-03T16:52:50.216747paragon sshd[612934]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=34.96.218.228
2020-10-03T16:52:50.212501paragon sshd[612934]: Invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796
2020-10-03T16:52:52.384280paragon sshd[612934]: Failed password for invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796 ssh2
2020-10-03T16:56:42.428013paragon sshd[613045]: Invalid user sonos from 34.96.218.228 port 48582
... |
2020-10-03 21:03:27 |
| 80.20.14.250 |
attackspambots |
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:26 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Failed password for invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250 port 37834 ssh2
Oct 3 15:02:57 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250 user=root
Oct 3 15:02:59 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: Failed password for root from 80.20.14.250 port 56000 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 21:18:02 |