城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): United States of America (the)
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 184.50.101.203
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 18523
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;184.50.101.203. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 29 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025020300 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 14 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 03 21:59:34 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 107203.101.50.184.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer a184-50-101-203.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
203.101.50.184.in-addr.arpa name = a184-50-101-203.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.255.48.197 | attackspambots | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-04 04:44:26 |
| 124.112.205.132 | attack | Oct 2 16:24:09 r.ca sshd[26622]: Failed password for root from 124.112.205.132 port 44166 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 05:12:44 |
| 208.86.161.196 | attackbotsspam | 2020-10-02T13:40:50.401868-07:00 suse-nuc sshd[8185]: Invalid user admin from 208.86.161.196 port 51566 ... |
2020-10-04 05:21:18 |
| 195.133.56.185 | attackspam | (mod_security) mod_security (id:210730) triggered by 195.133.56.185 (CZ/Czechia/-): 5 in the last 300 secs |
2020-10-04 04:48:36 |
| 197.248.19.226 | attackbotsspam | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 197.248.19.226 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-10-04 05:08:20 |
| 114.129.168.188 | attackspambots | [MK-VM5] Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-04 05:02:06 |
| 83.239.38.2 | attack | Oct 2 16:17:17 *hidden* sshd[12275]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.239.38.2 Oct 2 16:17:20 *hidden* sshd[12275]: Failed password for invalid user admin from 83.239.38.2 port 58160 ssh2 Oct 2 16:26:41 *hidden* sshd[16513]: Invalid user tom from 83.239.38.2 port 33522 |
2020-10-04 04:46:39 |
| 189.154.176.137 | attackspambots | 2020-10-03T03:22:39.728175hostname sshd[49215]: Failed password for invalid user portal from 189.154.176.137 port 48876 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-04 04:52:18 |
| 45.67.234.168 | attack | From retorno-leonir.tsi=toptec.net.br@praticoerapido.live Fri Oct 02 13:41:00 2020 Received: from [45.67.234.168] (port=58989 helo=01host234168.praticoerapido.live) |
2020-10-04 05:09:53 |
| 46.105.75.105 | attackbots | $f2bV_matches |
2020-10-04 04:50:32 |
| 46.101.5.144 | attackbots | 20 attempts against mh-ssh on soil |
2020-10-04 05:04:47 |
| 119.45.46.159 | attack | Oct 3 22:38:48 v22019038103785759 sshd\[8173\]: Invalid user myuser1 from 119.45.46.159 port 59826 Oct 3 22:38:48 v22019038103785759 sshd\[8173\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=119.45.46.159 Oct 3 22:38:50 v22019038103785759 sshd\[8173\]: Failed password for invalid user myuser1 from 119.45.46.159 port 59826 ssh2 Oct 3 22:44:41 v22019038103785759 sshd\[8809\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=119.45.46.159 user=root Oct 3 22:44:43 v22019038103785759 sshd\[8809\]: Failed password for root from 119.45.46.159 port 35086 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-04 04:47:19 |
| 220.247.201.109 | attackspam | Oct 3 19:00:19 abendstille sshd\[20204\]: Invalid user andre from 220.247.201.109 Oct 3 19:00:19 abendstille sshd\[20204\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.247.201.109 Oct 3 19:00:21 abendstille sshd\[20204\]: Failed password for invalid user andre from 220.247.201.109 port 54014 ssh2 Oct 3 19:05:06 abendstille sshd\[24375\]: Invalid user open from 220.247.201.109 Oct 3 19:05:06 abendstille sshd\[24375\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.247.201.109 ... |
2020-10-04 05:06:12 |
| 95.128.242.174 | attackspambots | 20/10/2@16:40:56: FAIL: Alarm-Network address from=95.128.242.174 ... |
2020-10-04 05:14:35 |
| 182.254.195.46 | attackspam | 2020-10-03T03:21:23.160334hostname sshd[49089]: Failed password for invalid user ai from 182.254.195.46 port 35868 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-04 04:44:56 |