城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): Brazil
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 191.194.126.78
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 19995
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;191.194.126.78. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 426 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022091500 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 69 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Thu Sep 15 23:21:33 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 10778.126.194.191.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 191-194-126-78.user.vivozap.com.br.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
78.126.194.191.in-addr.arpa name = 191-194-126-78.user.vivozap.com.br.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 161.97.117.104 | attackbotsspam | (From nick@send.sohbetlal.com) I wanted to ask a question about your business. 1) As a business owner, new laws are on your side - effective starting August 2019. Were you aware? Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We represent merchants challenging their credit card processors. 3) Merchants working with us demand to be switched to Unlimited Flat-Fee Processing. - Unlimited Flat-Fee Processing for $24.99 per month. The new terminals make it easy. And it's UNLIMITED. 4) Process any amount of cards for the same flat price each month. No contracts. No surprises. No hidden fees. We'll even start you off with a terminal at no cost. September 2020 Limited Time Promotion: Email back today to qualify: - Free Equipment (Maximum 2x Terminals). - No Contracts. - No Cancellation Fees. - Try Witho |
2020-09-23 06:18:07 |
| 161.97.90.156 | attackspambots | Invalid user eoffice from 161.97.90.156 port 42366 |
2020-09-23 06:28:27 |
| 114.67.87.218 | attackspam | Found on Github Combined on 3 lists / proto=6 . srcport=47522 . dstport=29713 . (3081) |
2020-09-23 06:13:43 |
| 36.89.25.170 | attackbotsspam | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 36.89.25.170 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-09-23 05:56:16 |
| 61.244.247.202 | attack | Sep 22 16:48:11 XXX sshd[30553]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:11 XXX sshd[30553]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Sep 22 16:48:12 XXX sshd[30555]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:13 XXX sshd[30555]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Sep 22 16:48:14 XXX sshd[30557]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:15 XXX sshd[30557]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Sep 22 16:48:16 XXX sshd[30559]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:16 XXX sshd[30559]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Sep 22 16:48:18 XXX sshd[30561]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:18 XXX sshd[30561]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Sep 22 16:48:20 XXX sshd[30564]: Invalid user admin from 61.244.247.202 Sep 22 16:48:20 XXX sshd[30564]: Received disconnect from 61.244.247.202........ ------------------------------- |
2020-09-23 06:32:02 |
| 188.166.172.189 | attackspambots | (sshd) Failed SSH login from 188.166.172.189 (GB/United Kingdom/montem.io): 5 in the last 3600 secs |
2020-09-23 05:56:38 |
| 217.182.253.249 | attackbots | Auto Fail2Ban report, multiple SSH login attempts. |
2020-09-23 06:01:48 |
| 54.198.154.157 | attackbots | Automatic report - Port Scan |
2020-09-23 06:22:33 |
| 54.36.163.141 | attack | SSH Brute Force |
2020-09-23 06:25:44 |
| 194.169.190.228 | attack | Automatic report - Port Scan Attack |
2020-09-23 06:14:30 |
| 106.13.183.216 | attackbots | Sep 22 23:34:32 [host] sshd[8683]: pam_unix(sshd:a Sep 22 23:34:34 [host] sshd[8683]: Failed password Sep 22 23:40:29 [host] sshd[9259]: Invalid user fr Sep 22 23:40:29 [host] sshd[9259]: pam_unix(sshd:a |
2020-09-23 05:55:37 |
| 188.245.209.2 | attack | 20 attempts against mh-ssh on river |
2020-09-23 06:02:09 |
| 178.128.80.85 | attackbotsspam | Sep 22 21:13:36 nopemail auth.info sshd[28457]: Disconnected from authenticating user root 178.128.80.85 port 55146 [preauth] ... |
2020-09-23 06:21:20 |
| 95.175.17.4 | attack | 2020-09-22T21:35:09.476062abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25847]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=95.175.17.4 user=root 2020-09-22T21:35:11.238194abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25847]: Failed password for root from 95.175.17.4 port 55548 ssh2 2020-09-22T21:38:51.065799abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25907]: Invalid user cam from 95.175.17.4 port 37764 2020-09-22T21:38:51.073012abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25907]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=95.175.17.4 2020-09-22T21:38:51.065799abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25907]: Invalid user cam from 95.175.17.4 port 37764 2020-09-22T21:38:53.311875abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25907]: Failed password for invalid user cam from 95.175.17.4 port 37764 ssh2 2020-09-22T21:42:24.836145abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd[25958]: Invalid user dev1 from 95.175.17.4 port 48210 ... |
2020-09-23 06:15:05 |
| 178.129.82.213 | attackbots | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 178.129.82.213 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-09-23 06:17:36 |