城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): United States
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 216.66.15.27
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 50169
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;216.66.15.27. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 599 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022021801 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 82 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sat Feb 19 01:52:13 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 10527.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa.
27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer nacla.org.
27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer kahlo.mayfirst.org.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa canonical name = 27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa.
27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa name = nacla.org.
27.0-27.15.66.216.in-addr.arpa name = kahlo.mayfirst.org.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 207.244.252.113 | attackspam | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-04 04:00:38 |
| 117.50.7.14 | attackbots | SSH login attempts. |
2020-10-04 04:05:35 |
| 115.96.137.84 | attackspambots | Port Scan detected! ... |
2020-10-04 04:20:30 |
| 106.12.95.45 | attack | Invalid user florian from 106.12.95.45 port 37718 |
2020-10-04 04:06:07 |
| 119.254.155.39 | attackbotsspam | 504 Authentication not enabled. |
2020-10-04 03:59:00 |
| 94.102.56.238 | attackspambots | Port probe and connect to SMTP:25. Auth intiated but dropped. |
2020-10-04 03:59:49 |
| 122.176.84.178 | attackbots | 1601670773 - 10/02/2020 22:32:53 Host: 122.176.84.178/122.176.84.178 Port: 445 TCP Blocked ... |
2020-10-04 04:17:36 |
| 103.141.174.130 | attackspam | srvr2: (mod_security) mod_security (id:920350) triggered by 103.141.174.130 (BD/-/-): 1 in the last 600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_MODSEC; Logs: 2020/10/02 22:33:37 [error] 142888#0: *187758 [client 103.141.174.130] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 406 (phase 2). Matched "Operator `Rx' with parameter `^[\d.:]+$' against variable `REQUEST_HEADERS:Host' [redacted] [file "/etc/modsecurity.d/REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT.conf"] [line "718"] [id "920350"] [rev ""] [msg "Host header is a numeric IP address"] [redacted] [severity "4"] [ver "OWASP_CRS/3.3.0"] [maturity "0"] [accuracy "0"] [tag "application-multi"] [tag "language-multi"] [tag "platform-multi"] [tag "attack-protocol"] [tag "paranoia-level/1"] [tag "OWASP_CRS"] [tag "capec/1000/210/272"] [tag "PCI/6.5.10"] [redacted] [uri "/"] [unique_id "160167081795.491896"] [ref "o0,15v21,15"], client: 103.141.174.130, [redacted] request: "GET / HTTP/1.1" [redacted] |
2020-10-04 03:51:15 |
| 111.231.193.72 | attackbots | (sshd) Failed SSH login from 111.231.193.72 (CN/China/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs |
2020-10-04 04:15:09 |
| 218.104.225.140 | attack | 2020-10-03T19:39:58.207727shield sshd\[10779\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.104.225.140 user=root 2020-10-03T19:39:59.908857shield sshd\[10779\]: Failed password for root from 218.104.225.140 port 53356 ssh2 2020-10-03T19:43:31.371453shield sshd\[11306\]: Invalid user support from 218.104.225.140 port 32797 2020-10-03T19:43:31.381064shield sshd\[11306\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.104.225.140 2020-10-03T19:43:33.659824shield sshd\[11306\]: Failed password for invalid user support from 218.104.225.140 port 32797 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 03:57:29 |
| 114.67.77.159 | attack | Oct 3 19:59:17 mavik sshd[10789]: Failed password for invalid user ju from 114.67.77.159 port 58094 ssh2 Oct 3 20:02:04 mavik sshd[10896]: Invalid user igor from 114.67.77.159 Oct 3 20:02:04 mavik sshd[10896]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=114.67.77.159 Oct 3 20:02:07 mavik sshd[10896]: Failed password for invalid user igor from 114.67.77.159 port 42814 ssh2 Oct 3 20:04:58 mavik sshd[10964]: Invalid user admin from 114.67.77.159 ... |
2020-10-04 04:12:34 |
| 177.73.2.57 | attackspambots | Failed password for invalid user usuario from 177.73.2.57 port 42940 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:21:15 |
| 114.4.227.194 | attackbotsspam | Oct 3 18:57:06 scw-focused-cartwright sshd[32121]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=114.4.227.194 Oct 3 18:57:08 scw-focused-cartwright sshd[32121]: Failed password for invalid user test from 114.4.227.194 port 55182 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:01:20 |
| 103.84.175.197 | attackbotsspam | CMS (WordPress or Joomla) login attempt. |
2020-10-04 03:56:11 |
| 62.4.16.46 | attackspambots | IP blocked |
2020-10-04 04:21:27 |