城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): Germany
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 34.40.104.26
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 3029
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;34.40.104.26. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 30 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025021400 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 57 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sat Feb 15 01:24:52 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 10526.104.40.34.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 26.104.40.34.bc.googleusercontent.com.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
26.104.40.34.in-addr.arpa name = 26.104.40.34.bc.googleusercontent.com.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41.37.168.71 | attack | Port 1433 Scan |
2019-12-01 23:48:36 |
| 111.230.241.245 | attack | Dec 01 08:39:46 askasleikir sshd[102830]: Failed password for invalid user user3 from 111.230.241.245 port 35182 ssh2 |
2019-12-01 23:55:42 |
| 92.63.196.3 | attackspambots | Dec 1 17:03:07 mc1 kernel: \[6502401.256070\] \[UFW BLOCK\] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=96:00:00:11:a9:7b:d2:74:7f:6e:37:e3:08:00 SRC=92.63.196.3 DST=159.69.205.51 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=244 ID=36449 PROTO=TCP SPT=42605 DPT=3385 WINDOW=1024 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Dec 1 17:06:04 mc1 kernel: \[6502578.022800\] \[UFW BLOCK\] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=96:00:00:11:a9:7b:d2:74:7f:6e:37:e3:08:00 SRC=92.63.196.3 DST=159.69.205.51 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=244 ID=17264 PROTO=TCP SPT=42605 DPT=8189 WINDOW=1024 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Dec 1 17:07:56 mc1 kernel: \[6502690.516471\] \[UFW BLOCK\] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=96:00:00:11:a9:7b:d2:74:7f:6e:37:e3:08:00 SRC=92.63.196.3 DST=159.69.205.51 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=244 ID=15349 PROTO=TCP SPT=42605 DPT=3341 WINDOW=1024 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 ... |
2019-12-02 00:13:10 |
| 159.90.82.123 | attack | 2019-12-01T15:30:49.950228abusebot-5.cloudsearch.cf sshd\[18924\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=159.90.82.123 user=root |
2019-12-01 23:38:23 |
| 45.232.73.100 | attack | 2019-12-01T15:44:40.751521centos sshd\[4661\]: Invalid user pi from 45.232.73.100 port 44150 2019-12-01T15:44:40.751522centos sshd\[4660\]: Invalid user pi from 45.232.73.100 port 44148 2019-12-01T15:44:41.009863centos sshd\[4660\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=45.232.73.100 2019-12-01T15:44:41.009946centos sshd\[4661\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=45.232.73.100 |
2019-12-02 00:09:57 |
| 185.9.147.100 | attack | Automatic report - XMLRPC Attack |
2019-12-02 00:05:25 |
| 107.175.77.164 | attack | (From eric@talkwithcustomer.com) Hey, You have a website mikulachiropractic.net, right? Of course you do. I am looking at your website now. It gets traffic every day – that you’re probably spending $2 / $4 / $10 or more a click to get. Not including all of the work you put into creating social media, videos, blog posts, emails, and so on. So you’re investing seriously in getting people to that site. But how’s it working? Great? Okay? Not so much? If that answer could be better, then it’s likely you’re putting a lot of time, effort, and money into an approach that’s not paying off like it should. Now… imagine doubling your lead conversion in just minutes… In fact, I’ll go even better. You could actually get up to 100X more conversions! I’m not making this up. As Chris Smith, best-selling author of The Conversion Code says: Speed is essential - there is a 100x decrease in Leads when a Lead is contacted within 14 minutes vs being contacted within 5 minutes. He’s backed up by a |
2019-12-01 23:30:22 |
| 218.92.0.179 | attackbotsspam | Dec 1 13:01:16 v22018086721571380 sshd[25847]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 218.92.0.179 port 40362 ssh2 [preauth] Dec 1 16:53:30 v22018086721571380 sshd[8220]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 218.92.0.179 port 2862 ssh2 [preauth] |
2019-12-01 23:54:41 |
| 58.69.139.152 | attackspambots | firewall-block, port(s): 26/tcp |
2019-12-01 23:58:04 |
| 124.78.194.100 | attackbotsspam | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 124.78.194.100 on Port 445(SMB) |
2019-12-01 23:32:06 |
| 51.75.195.222 | attackspambots | Dec 1 16:51:27 markkoudstaal sshd[31479]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=51.75.195.222 Dec 1 16:51:29 markkoudstaal sshd[31479]: Failed password for invalid user skiada from 51.75.195.222 port 60684 ssh2 Dec 1 16:56:55 markkoudstaal sshd[31950]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=51.75.195.222 |
2019-12-01 23:57:34 |
| 189.170.69.106 | attack | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 189.170.69.106 on Port 445(SMB) |
2019-12-01 23:40:16 |
| 61.177.172.128 | attackbots | pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.177.172.128 user=root Failed password for root from 61.177.172.128 port 53552 ssh2 Failed password for root from 61.177.172.128 port 53552 ssh2 Failed password for root from 61.177.172.128 port 53552 ssh2 Failed password for root from 61.177.172.128 port 53552 ssh2 |
2019-12-01 23:53:44 |
| 46.38.144.17 | attack | Dec 1 16:57:25 relay postfix/smtpd\[18446\]: warning: unknown\[46.38.144.17\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Dec 1 16:57:52 relay postfix/smtpd\[4808\]: warning: unknown\[46.38.144.17\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Dec 1 16:58:02 relay postfix/smtpd\[18446\]: warning: unknown\[46.38.144.17\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Dec 1 16:58:30 relay postfix/smtpd\[6935\]: warning: unknown\[46.38.144.17\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Dec 1 16:58:39 relay postfix/smtpd\[16256\]: warning: unknown\[46.38.144.17\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 ... |
2019-12-02 00:01:20 |
| 201.24.82.11 | attackspam | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 201.24.82.11 on Port 445(SMB) |
2019-12-01 23:37:31 |