| 220.247.201.109 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 13:52:02 vps639187 sshd\[326\]: Invalid user miles from 220.247.201.109 port 57650
Oct 3 13:52:02 vps639187 sshd\[326\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.247.201.109
Oct 3 13:52:03 vps639187 sshd\[326\]: Failed password for invalid user miles from 220.247.201.109 port 57650 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 21:14:58 |
| 60.15.67.178 |
attackspambots |
Invalid user admin from 60.15.67.178 port 28893 |
2020-10-03 21:54:58 |
| 195.54.167.152 |
attack |
Cowrie Honeypot: 10 unauthorised SSH/Telnet login attempts between 2020-10-03T09:49:12Z and 2020-10-03T11:48:15Z |
2020-10-03 20:50:53 |
| 35.204.93.160 |
attack |
RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus
- UBE 188.240.221.164 (EHLO digitaldreamss.org) Virtono Networks Srl - BLACKLISTED
- Spam link digitaldreamss.org = 188.240.221.161 Virtono Networks Srl – BLACKLISTED
- Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – repetitive phishing redirect:
a) aptrk15.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) trck.fun = 104.18.35.68, 104.18.34.68, 172.67.208.63 Cloudflare
c) muw.agileconnection.company = 107.179.2.229 Global Frag Networks (common with multiple spam series)
d) effective URL: www.google.com
Images - 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/j2cp9tu3.png = link to health fraud video
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/ugqwjele.png = unsubscribe; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:02:02 |
| 185.176.220.179 |
attackspambots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:57:58 |
| 103.246.240.30 |
attackspambots |
103.246.240.30 (IN/India/-), 6 distributed sshd attacks on account [root] in the last 3600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_DISTATTACK; Logs: Oct 3 07:32:17 server2 sshd[31775]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30 user=root
Oct 3 07:32:19 server2 sshd[31775]: Failed password for root from 103.246.240.30 port 50354 ssh2
Oct 3 07:25:20 server2 sshd[25560]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=156.54.174.197 user=root
Oct 3 07:25:22 server2 sshd[25560]: Failed password for root from 156.54.174.197 port 52856 ssh2
Oct 3 07:23:44 server2 sshd[23663]: Failed password for root from 160.153.252.9 port 51300 ssh2
Oct 3 07:34:28 server2 sshd[1237]: Failed password for root from 92.222.77.150 port 50012 ssh2
IP Addresses Blocked: |
2020-10-03 20:46:33 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 119.250.155.73 |
attackbotsspam |
SSH/22 MH Probe, BF, Hack - |
2020-10-03 21:14:31 |
| 170.0.160.165 |
attackspam |
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 20:51:29 |
| 41.207.7.240 |
attack |
Lines containing failures of 41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31337]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57604
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31338]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57607
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31341]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57651
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Failed password for invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884 ssh2
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57893
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Connection closed by invalid user dircreate 41.207.7.240 port ........
------------------------------ |
2020-10-03 20:41:29 |
| 211.220.27.191 |
attackbotsspam |
Invalid user jack from 211.220.27.191 port 37902 |
2020-10-03 20:49:17 |
| 60.174.248.244 |
attackspam |
TCP (SYN) 60.174.248.244:42413 -> port 15090, len 44 |
2020-10-03 21:01:31 |
| 189.240.117.236 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 14:24:54 icinga sshd[40529]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.240.117.236
Oct 3 14:24:56 icinga sshd[40529]: Failed password for invalid user scaner from 189.240.117.236 port 54796 ssh2
Oct 3 14:36:26 icinga sshd[58302]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.240.117.236
... |
2020-10-03 21:57:24 |
| 193.112.191.228 |
attack |
Automatic Fail2ban report - Trying login SSH |
2020-10-03 21:07:39 |
| 159.65.154.48 |
attack |
[N3.H3.VM3] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 21:55:53 |