城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): United States of America (the)
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 70.109.105.139
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 15009
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;70.109.105.139. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 30 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025020901 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 10 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 10 06:18:39 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 107Host 139.105.109.70.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
** server can't find 139.105.109.70.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45.82.32.214 | attackbotsspam | Postfix DNSBL listed. Trying to send SPAM. |
2019-11-04 21:16:28 |
| 171.244.43.52 | attackbots | Nov 4 13:39:08 vps691689 sshd[26221]: Failed password for root from 171.244.43.52 port 39728 ssh2 Nov 4 13:45:38 vps691689 sshd[26334]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=171.244.43.52 ... |
2019-11-04 20:56:57 |
| 198.46.225.100 | attackspambots | (From eric@talkwithcustomer.com) Hey, You have a website naturalhealthdcs.com, right? Of course you do. I am looking at your website now. It gets traffic every day – that you’re probably spending $2 / $4 / $10 or more a click to get. Not including all of the work you put into creating social media, videos, blog posts, emails, and so on. So you’re investing seriously in getting people to that site. But how’s it working? Great? Okay? Not so much? If that answer could be better, then it’s likely you’re putting a lot of time, effort, and money into an approach that’s not paying off like it should. Now… imagine doubling your lead conversion in just minutes… In fact, I’ll go even better. You could actually get up to 100X more conversions! I’m not making this up. As Chris Smith, best-selling author of The Conversion Code says: Speed is essential - there is a 100x decrease in Leads when a Lead is contacted within 14 minutes vs being contacted within 5 minutes. He’s backed up by a st |
2019-11-04 21:06:21 |
| 104.238.73.216 | attackspambots | diesunddas.net 104.238.73.216 \[04/Nov/2019:09:50:28 +0100\] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 8411 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 \(X11\; Ubuntu\; Linux x86_64\; rv:62.0\) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0" diesunddas.net 104.238.73.216 \[04/Nov/2019:09:50:30 +0100\] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 8411 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 \(X11\; Ubuntu\; Linux x86_64\; rv:62.0\) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0" |
2019-11-04 20:37:59 |
| 23.94.154.183 | attackbotsspam | (From eric@talkwithcustomer.com) Hey, You have a website naturalhealthdcs.com, right? Of course you do. I am looking at your website now. It gets traffic every day – that you’re probably spending $2 / $4 / $10 or more a click to get. Not including all of the work you put into creating social media, videos, blog posts, emails, and so on. So you’re investing seriously in getting people to that site. But how’s it working? Great? Okay? Not so much? If that answer could be better, then it’s likely you’re putting a lot of time, effort, and money into an approach that’s not paying off like it should. Now… imagine doubling your lead conversion in just minutes… In fact, I’ll go even better. You could actually get up to 100X more conversions! I’m not making this up. As Chris Smith, best-selling author of The Conversion Code says: Speed is essential - there is a 100x decrease in Leads when a Lead is contacted within 14 minutes vs being contacted within 5 minutes. He’s backed up by a st |
2019-11-04 21:03:13 |
| 59.92.216.207 | attack | Unauthorised access (Nov 4) SRC=59.92.216.207 LEN=52 PREC=0x20 TTL=110 ID=10611 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN Unauthorised access (Nov 4) SRC=59.92.216.207 LEN=52 PREC=0x20 TTL=110 ID=7081 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN |
2019-11-04 20:57:44 |
| 185.76.34.87 | attackbotsspam | k+ssh-bruteforce |
2019-11-04 21:06:36 |
| 177.45.48.252 | attackbots | SSH/22 MH Probe, BF, Hack - |
2019-11-04 20:56:29 |
| 177.94.204.150 | attackbotsspam | email spam |
2019-11-04 20:41:09 |
| 123.30.249.104 | attackspambots | 2019-11-04T08:35:53.064796shield sshd\[5284\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=123.30.249.104 user=root 2019-11-04T08:35:54.865667shield sshd\[5284\]: Failed password for root from 123.30.249.104 port 37200 ssh2 2019-11-04T08:40:28.799852shield sshd\[5939\]: Invalid user tester from 123.30.249.104 port 45942 2019-11-04T08:40:28.805358shield sshd\[5939\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=123.30.249.104 2019-11-04T08:40:30.360034shield sshd\[5939\]: Failed password for invalid user tester from 123.30.249.104 port 45942 ssh2 |
2019-11-04 21:20:41 |
| 103.252.250.107 | attack | Nov 4 08:56:15 server sshd\[21177\]: Invalid user user1 from 103.252.250.107 Nov 4 08:56:15 server sshd\[21177\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.252.250.107 Nov 4 08:56:16 server sshd\[21177\]: Failed password for invalid user user1 from 103.252.250.107 port 47550 ssh2 Nov 4 09:22:02 server sshd\[27636\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.252.250.107 user=root Nov 4 09:22:03 server sshd\[27636\]: Failed password for root from 103.252.250.107 port 51436 ssh2 ... |
2019-11-04 20:46:42 |
| 185.176.27.254 | attackspam | 11/04/2019-07:30:42.514973 185.176.27.254 Protocol: 6 ET DROP Dshield Block Listed Source group 1 |
2019-11-04 20:47:01 |
| 193.32.163.74 | attackbotsspam | firewall-block, port(s): 3397/tcp |
2019-11-04 20:58:58 |
| 51.15.84.19 | attack | Nov 4 05:23:20 mail sshd\[46403\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=51.15.84.19 user=root ... |
2019-11-04 20:38:34 |
| 178.239.225.245 | attack | postfix (unknown user, SPF fail or relay access denied) |
2019-11-04 20:40:12 |