城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): United States of America (the)
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 75.89.28.249
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 46450
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;75.89.28.249. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 30 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025013100 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 10 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Fri Jan 31 15:41:13 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 105
249.28.89.75.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer h249.28.89.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net.
Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
249.28.89.75.in-addr.arpa name = h249.28.89.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net.
Authoritative answers can be found from:
| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81.69.177.253 | attackbotsspam | SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 06:49:58 |
| 129.211.73.2 | attackbots | 3x Failed Password |
2020-10-03 07:09:32 |
| 35.204.93.160 | attack | RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus |
2020-10-03 07:08:17 |
| 1.255.48.197 | attack | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 06:58:51 |
| 122.14.228.229 | attackbots | Oct 3 00:36:23 ns381471 sshd[21588]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=122.14.228.229 Oct 3 00:36:25 ns381471 sshd[21588]: Failed password for invalid user alex from 122.14.228.229 port 33060 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 07:17:50 |
| 45.148.121.92 | attack | 45.148.121.92 was recorded 5 times by 4 hosts attempting to connect to the following ports: 5060. Incident counter (4h, 24h, all-time): 5, 11, 60 |
2020-10-03 06:54:22 |
| 103.90.228.16 | attackspambots | 20 attempts against mh-misbehave-ban on dawn |
2020-10-03 07:09:10 |
| 185.216.140.43 | attack | firewall-block, port(s): 50026/tcp, 50039/tcp, 50044/tcp, 50069/tcp, 50092/tcp |
2020-10-03 07:13:05 |
| 183.166.170.133 | attack | Oct 2 22:30:45 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[1755\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:34:11 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[6490\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:37:37 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:41:03 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:41:14 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 ... |
2020-10-03 07:11:24 |
| 103.246.240.30 | attack | 2020-10-02T21:41:36.604284ionos.janbro.de sshd[199557]: Invalid user api from 103.246.240.30 port 51056 2020-10-02T21:41:36.699144ionos.janbro.de sshd[199557]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30 2020-10-02T21:41:36.604284ionos.janbro.de sshd[199557]: Invalid user api from 103.246.240.30 port 51056 2020-10-02T21:41:38.742533ionos.janbro.de sshd[199557]: Failed password for invalid user api from 103.246.240.30 port 51056 ssh2 2020-10-02T21:45:24.756213ionos.janbro.de sshd[199572]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30 user=root 2020-10-02T21:45:27.099680ionos.janbro.de sshd[199572]: Failed password for root from 103.246.240.30 port 57750 ssh2 2020-10-02T21:49:16.514336ionos.janbro.de sshd[199589]: Invalid user user from 103.246.240.30 port 36236 2020-10-02T21:49:16.744709ionos.janbro.de sshd[199589]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= ui ... |
2020-10-03 06:54:06 |
| 89.233.112.6 | attackspambots | port scan and connect, tcp 23 (telnet) |
2020-10-03 06:55:38 |
| 61.155.2.142 | attackspambots | Oct 2 20:39:16 ns3033917 sshd[17341]: Invalid user oracle from 61.155.2.142 port 32642 Oct 2 20:39:18 ns3033917 sshd[17341]: Failed password for invalid user oracle from 61.155.2.142 port 32642 ssh2 Oct 2 20:41:26 ns3033917 sshd[17361]: Invalid user rstudio from 61.155.2.142 port 7425 ... |
2020-10-03 07:04:56 |
| 190.36.156.72 | attackbots | Unauthorised access (Oct 2) SRC=190.36.156.72 LEN=52 TTL=116 ID=7606 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN |
2020-10-03 07:10:56 |
| 199.187.211.101 | attackbotsspam | 4,12-01/02 [bc00/m26] PostRequest-Spammer scoring: paris |
2020-10-03 12:03:31 |
| 122.155.223.59 | attackspam | SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 06:48:46 |