城市(city): unknown
省份(region): unknown
国家(country): Slovakia
运营商(isp): unknown
主机名(hostname): unknown
机构(organization): unknown
使用类型(Usage Type): unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 94.136.142.200
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 63917
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;94.136.142.200. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 30 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025021800 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 57 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Tue Feb 18 23:23:21 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 107200.142.136.94.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 94-136-142-200.minet.sk.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
200.142.136.94.in-addr.arpa name = 94-136-142-200.minet.sk.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | 类型 | 评论内容 | 时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.255.48.197 | attack | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 06:58:51 |
| 154.209.253.241 | attackbotsspam | ssh intrusion attempt |
2020-10-03 07:11:47 |
| 61.133.232.253 | attackbotsspam | Oct 3 00:05:17 *hidden* sshd[29098]: Failed password for invalid user nexus from 61.133.232.253 port 46546 ssh2 Oct 3 00:11:42 *hidden* sshd[32012]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.133.232.253 user=nginx Oct 3 00:11:43 *hidden* sshd[32012]: Failed password for *hidden* from 61.133.232.253 port 56062 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 06:54:41 |
| 139.59.161.78 | attack | Oct 2 22:59:28 DAAP sshd[3444]: Invalid user x from 139.59.161.78 port 12865 Oct 2 22:59:28 DAAP sshd[3444]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.59.161.78 Oct 2 22:59:28 DAAP sshd[3444]: Invalid user x from 139.59.161.78 port 12865 Oct 2 22:59:30 DAAP sshd[3444]: Failed password for invalid user x from 139.59.161.78 port 12865 ssh2 Oct 2 23:04:06 DAAP sshd[3524]: Invalid user deployer from 139.59.161.78 port 36970 ... |
2020-10-03 06:47:52 |
| 176.109.184.235 | attackbotsspam | Automated report (2020-10-03T00:30:09+02:00). Spambot detected. |
2020-10-03 06:52:08 |
| 122.155.223.59 | attackspam | SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 06:48:46 |
| 89.233.112.6 | attackspambots | port scan and connect, tcp 23 (telnet) |
2020-10-03 06:55:38 |
| 2.57.122.221 | attackspambots | Oct 2 18:01:24 vz239 sshd[17521]: Invalid user ubnt from 2.57.122.221 Oct 2 18:01:24 vz239 sshd[17521]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=2.57.122.221 Oct 2 18:01:27 vz239 sshd[17521]: Failed password for invalid user ubnt from 2.57.122.221 port 43296 ssh2 Oct 2 18:01:27 vz239 sshd[17521]: Received disconnect from 2.57.122.221: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 2 18:01:27 vz239 sshd[17523]: Invalid user admin from 2.57.122.221 Oct 2 18:01:27 vz239 sshd[17523]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=2.57.122.221 Oct 2 18:01:29 vz239 sshd[17523]: Failed password for invalid user admin from 2.57.122.221 port 51310 ssh2 Oct 2 18:01:29 vz239 sshd[17523]: Received disconnect from 2.57.122.221: 11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 2 18:01:30 vz239 sshd[17525]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=2.57.122.221 user=r.r Oct 2 18:01:3........ ------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 06:59:26 |
| 139.155.91.141 | attackspambots | 2020-10-02T22:35:38.294198shield sshd\[24953\]: Invalid user git from 139.155.91.141 port 38092 2020-10-02T22:35:38.303149shield sshd\[24953\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.155.91.141 2020-10-02T22:35:40.415755shield sshd\[24953\]: Failed password for invalid user git from 139.155.91.141 port 38092 ssh2 2020-10-02T22:40:28.378099shield sshd\[25266\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.155.91.141 user=root 2020-10-02T22:40:30.972083shield sshd\[25266\]: Failed password for root from 139.155.91.141 port 36610 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 06:46:51 |
| 183.166.170.133 | attack | Oct 2 22:30:45 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[1755\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:34:11 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[6490\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:37:37 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:41:03 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Oct 2 22:41:14 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 ... |
2020-10-03 07:11:24 |
| 122.14.228.229 | attackbots | Oct 3 00:36:23 ns381471 sshd[21588]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=122.14.228.229 Oct 3 00:36:25 ns381471 sshd[21588]: Failed password for invalid user alex from 122.14.228.229 port 33060 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 07:17:50 |
| 72.180.73.137 | attack | Oct 2 20:39:03 staging sshd[181430]: Invalid user cliente from 72.180.73.137 port 41824 Oct 2 20:39:05 staging sshd[181430]: Failed password for invalid user cliente from 72.180.73.137 port 41824 ssh2 Oct 2 20:41:11 staging sshd[181435]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=72.180.73.137 user=root Oct 2 20:41:12 staging sshd[181435]: Failed password for root from 72.180.73.137 port 49692 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-03 07:17:22 |
| 146.185.215.204 | attack | Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: warning: hostname bilaterale1.perkjcep.example.com does not resolve to address 146.185.215.204: Name or service not known Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: connect from unknown[146.185.215.204] Oct x@x Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: disconnect from unknown[146.185.215.204] ........ ----------------------------------------------- https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=146.185.215.204 |
2020-10-03 07:07:24 |
| 39.109.127.67 | attack | SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:19:36 |
| 83.233.41.228 | attackspambots | Lines containing failures of 83.233.41.228 Oct 1 11:28:39 jarvis sshd[31903]: Invalid user hacker from 83.233.41.228 port 54784 Oct 1 11:28:39 jarvis sshd[31903]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.233.41.228 Oct 1 11:28:41 jarvis sshd[31903]: Failed password for invalid user hacker from 83.233.41.228 port 54784 ssh2 Oct 1 11:28:42 jarvis sshd[31903]: Received disconnect from 83.233.41.228 port 54784:11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 1 11:28:42 jarvis sshd[31903]: Disconnected from invalid user hacker 83.233.41.228 port 54784 [preauth] Oct 1 11:39:37 jarvis sshd[765]: Invalid user spotlight from 83.233.41.228 port 35076 Oct 1 11:39:37 jarvis sshd[765]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.233.41.228 Oct 1 11:39:39 jarvis sshd[765]: Failed password for invalid user spotlight from 83.233.41.228 port 35076 ssh2 Oct 1 11:39:39 jarvis sshd[765]: Received disconnect........ ------------------------------ |
2020-10-03 06:46:23 |